Thomas Anshutz 1851-1912
Thomas Anshutz’s contribution as an artist is often overshadowed by his legacy as one of America’s great art instructors. Indeed he was an exceptional teacher––particularly adept in identifying his student’s strengths and encouraging their individuality––but he was also a courageous artist, who used his extensive technical skill to great advantage and pushed himself to broaden his style and philosophy without regard for what was fashionable.
Anshutz enrolled in PAFA in 1876, the year it reopened after a 5-year hiatus. He left the National Academy of Design in New York, where he had studied for two years, because of his dissatisfaction with the programmatic instruction. The Academy offered a larger course selection and most significantly emphasized life drawing classes and courses in anatomy. Thomas Eakins was largely responsible for this curriculum, and his influence at the Academy was profound during his tenure there. Eakins’s intense focus on anatomical study, dissection and life drawing made the Academy unique among American art schools. By the late 1870s and early 1880s, his pedagogy was nothing short of revolutionary. Eakins’s belief that good painting and sculpture were based on a sound understanding of anatomy, scientific accuracy, and careful observation became the cornerstone of his philosophy. This approach initially dovetailed nicely with PAFA’s longstanding tradition of realism. Anshutz was deeply affected by his teacher’s ideas and style; he subsequently became Eakins’s protégé, assisting him in anatomy dissections and then becoming chief demonstrator himself in 1880, when Eakins was named Professor of Drawing and Sculpture. In the fall of 1881, Anshutz was promoted to a full-time faculty member.
Like his teacher, Anshutz rejected what he saw as falseness and idealization in art. Randall Griffin in his book on Anshutz writes: “According to [Eakins and Anshutz], honesty and truth to one’s perceptions of nature constituted the only legitimate approach to art.” Both artists sought to capture mass and structure over meticulous detail. And while Anshutz never focused intensively on the nude as Eakins did, the human figure was central to his art from the 1870s onward. There is no question that Anshutz was indebted to Eakins’s influence; however, he never slavishly copied his work or recited his ideas by rote.
By the mid-1880s Anshutz had grown dissatisfied with some of Eakins’s theories and sought to broaden his artistic philosophy to include art for art’s sake aestheticism, Impressionism, and eventually Symbolism. It was this openness to new ideas coupled with a willingness to question accepted conventions that made him an exceptional teacher during a time of great change. William Homer astutely identified Anshutz as an important bridge between Thomas Eakins and the group of restless PAFA students who would eventually help make up The Eight. Even though Anshutz’s own art never really ventured beyond the academic tradition he helped to uphold, his philosophy and teaching method acted as catalysts for the beginnings of early American Modernism.